Big Brand Fails: What Major Companies Teach Us About Brand Resilience
- Laylen Hines

- Dec 4, 2025
- 3 min read
Even the most recognizable brands in the world make mistakes. What separates the ones who recover from the ones who don’t is how they respond—and how well they understand who they are at their core. After attending a recent PR webinar focused on brand wins and failures, one theme stood out across every example: your brand is your identity, your relationship with your audience, and the promises you consistently deliver on.
Strong brands evolve, but they don’t drift. And when they do drift, their audience notices immediately.
When Rebranding Breaks Connection: The Jaguar Case
Jaguar’s visual rebrand is a clear reminder that the execution of a design isn’t the issue. The alignment is. By shifting toward a more modern, simplified aesthetic, Jaguar unintentionally traded its signature feeling of luxury for an identity that felt more mass-market. The lesson is straightforward: when a brand update doesn’t reflect the emotional value your customers associate with you, even a beautifully designed rollout can create distance instead of connection.

Nike: A Misstep and a Masterclass in Recovery
Nike has built decades of trust on a message of empowerment, unity, and perseverance. That’s why one of their recent campaign lines—“My dream is to end theirs”—landed sharply off brand. The tone was aggressive rather than inspiring, and audiences felt it immediately.
What Nike did next is the part worth studying. Instead of ignoring the backlash or doubling down, they shifted quickly to a more grounded message: “Winning isn’t comfortable.” It didn’t immediately erase the misstep, but it helped transition the narrative back to Nike’s core values. Eventually, they returned to “Just Do It,” which served as both a reset and a reaffirmation of who they are. It’s a strategic example of acknowledging error without announcing it and letting the brand’s legacy speak for itself.

Listening Is a Brand Strategy: HBO and Cracker Barrel
HBO’s attempt to simplify “HBO Max” into “HBO” created confusion around what the platform actually offered. Customers spoke up, and HBO listened. The company restored the original name, openly recognizing that the change wasn’t working for their audience.
Cracker Barrel had a similar experience when it introduced a modernized logo. Loyal customers didn’t reject the design, but they rejected the loss of the brand’s longstanding sense of nostalgia and familiarity. The company reversed course, showing that responsiveness is sometimes the most effective form of brand protection.

What These Failures Reveal About Brand Identity
Across these examples, the same lessons surfaced repeatedly: Brands should evolve, but not at the expense of who they are. Audiences build emotional equity over time, and when a brand shifts too far, too fast, it creates friction. The companies that recover most effectively aren’t the ones who avoid mistakes; they’re the ones who view mistakes as data and respond with clarity.
Key Takeaways for Communications and PR Professionals
Protect your core identity. Progress shouldn’t mean erasing what people already trust.
Understand the emotional equity you hold. Decisions that overlook this rarely land well.
Know who you’re for. Strong research prevents a weak strategy.
Time matters. Even the right idea can fail if the timing is wrong.
Test before committing. A small pilot can save a major rebrand.
Use failures as feedback. Every stumble contains insight if you’re willing to look for it.
At ADELE, we believe that brand strategy is ultimately storytelling—clear, consistent, and grounded in audience understanding. These examples show that the strongest brands aren’t defined by avoiding failure. They’re defined by how they evolve, how they respond, and how they preserve the identity their audiences value most.
---
DISCLAIMER: All trademarks, logos, and images are the property of their respective owners. Their appearance on this site is for identification, informational, or commentary purposes only and does not imply any endorsement or affiliation.


Comments